Use Plan B: the three-step collaborative conversation
Empathize with the child’s concern, share yours, and invite them to solve it together.
Why it works
Plan B structures the conversation in a sequence that matters: empathy first lowers the child’s defensiveness and signals that their concern is real; sharing the adult’s concern second adds the other half of the problem; and inviting a collaborative solution last activates the child’s prefrontal reasoning rather than their threat response. The sequence only works in that order — leading with the adult’s concern triggers resistance before the child feels heard.
How to do it
- Empathy step: open with a neutral observation and invite their perspective. "I’ve noticed [X]. What’s up?" Then listen and reflect until they feel genuinely understood.
- Define the problem step: add your concern without negating theirs. "The thing is, I also worry about [Y]."
- Invitation step: ask collaboratively. "I wonder if there’s a way to solve this that works for both of us."
- Let the child generate the first solution; evaluate it against both concerns, not just yours.
Evidence
A randomized trial in a psychiatric facility found CPS significantly reduced restraint use and aggressive incidents compared to standard behavioral management. Randomized trials with oppositional children extend this: an initial RCT found CPS reduced oppositional behavior in affectively dysregulated youth, and a later head-to-head RCT found CPS comparable to established Parent Management Training for oppositional youth. (rct)
The strongest evidence comes from clinical/inpatient settings; generalization to typical home use is clinically supported but less rigorously studied in RCT form.
Sources
- Pollastri, A. R. et al. (2013). The Collaborative Problem Solving approach. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 21(4), 188–199.
- Greene, R. W., Ablon, J. S., Goring, J. C., Raezer-Blakely, L., Markey, J., Monuteaux, M. C., Henin, A., Edwards, G., & Rabbitt, S. (2004). Effectiveness of Collaborative Problem Solving in affectively dysregulated children with oppositional-defiant disorder: Initial findings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(6), 1157–1164.
- Ollendick, T. H., Greene, R. W., Austin, K. E., Fraire, M. G., Halldorsdottir, T., Allen, K. B., Jarrett, M. A., Lewis, K. M., Whitmore Smith, M., Cunningham, N. R., Noguchi, R. J., Canavera, K., & Wolff, J. C. (2016). Parent Management Training and Collaborative & Proactive Solutions: A randomized control trial for oppositional youth. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45(5), 591–604.
Common mistake
Skipping the empathy step and leading with your concern, which the child experiences as the usual lecture — activating resistance before collaboration can start.
Practice this with IX Coach
More practices for Collaborative Problem Solving (Ross Greene)
- Identify the lagging skill behind the behavior
Name the cognitive skill the child is missing, not the behavior you want to stop.
- Ross Greene’s Plan B, done proactively
Ross Greene’s Plan B works best proactively: hold the conversation in a calm window before the next explosion, not in the middle of one.
- Recognize when Plan A (unilateral imposition) makes things worse
Adult-imposed solutions can win the battle and lose the war — notice when enforcement is escalating rather than solving.
- Use empathy to de-escalate, not to capitulate
Name the child’s emotional state without agreeing with every demand — empathy and limits can coexist.
- Maintain an unsolved problems list
Write down recurring triggers so they become solvable problems rather than repeated emergencies.
- Evaluate solutions for durability: realistic, mutually satisfying, safe
A collaborative solution that fails one of three tests — realistic, mutually satisfying, safe — will not hold.