Identify the lagging skill behind the behavior
Name the cognitive skill the child is missing, not the behavior you want to stop.
Why it works
Explosive behavior is a downstream symptom of unsolved problems and underdeveloped cognitive skills such as flexibility, frustration tolerance, or the ability to shift from a preferred activity. Targeting the behavior with consequences leaves the lagging skill intact and guarantees the explosion will recur under similar demands. Naming the skill shifts the intervention from punishment to skill-building, which is the level where durable change happens.
How to do it
- For each recurring explosion, ask: what cognitive skill is this situation demanding that this child doesn’t yet have?
- Use Greene’s Assessment of Lagging Skills and Unsolved Problems (ALSUP) as a checklist to identify the specific deficit.
- Share the assessment with teachers or other caregivers so responses are consistent across settings.
- Revisit the assessment as the child develops — skills that were lagging at age six may be present at age nine.
Evidence
Greene’s model is grounded in developmental neuropsychology: executive function deficits are well documented as a predictor of behavioral dysregulation in children with ADHD, ODD, and related conditions. Meta-analyses confirm the link both cross-sectionally in preschoolers with externalizing behavior and prospectively, with weaker early executive function predicting later externalizing and internalizing problems. (observational)
The lagging-skills framework is theoretically grounded; direct empirical tests of skill-identification as an isolated intervention step are limited. Clinical observations are the primary support.
Sources
- Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65–94.
- Schoemaker, K., Mulder, H., Deković, M., & Matthys, W. (2013). Executive functions in preschool children with externalizing behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(3), 457–471.
- Yang, Y., Shields, G. S., Zhang, Y., Wu, H., Chen, H., & Romer, A. L. (2022). Child executive function and future externalizing and internalizing problems: A meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 97, 102194.
Common mistake
Labeling the child as “lazy” or “manipulative” instead of identifying the skill gap — which determines whether you intervene as a coach or as an enforcer.
Practice this with IX Coach
More practices for Collaborative Problem Solving (Ross Greene)
- Use Plan B: the three-step collaborative conversation
Empathize with the child’s concern, share yours, and invite them to solve it together.
- Ross Greene’s Plan B, done proactively
Ross Greene’s Plan B works best proactively: hold the conversation in a calm window before the next explosion, not in the middle of one.
- Recognize when Plan A (unilateral imposition) makes things worse
Adult-imposed solutions can win the battle and lose the war — notice when enforcement is escalating rather than solving.
- Use empathy to de-escalate, not to capitulate
Name the child’s emotional state without agreeing with every demand — empathy and limits can coexist.
- Maintain an unsolved problems list
Write down recurring triggers so they become solvable problems rather than repeated emergencies.
- Evaluate solutions for durability: realistic, mutually satisfying, safe
A collaborative solution that fails one of three tests — realistic, mutually satisfying, safe — will not hold.