Recognize when Plan A (unilateral imposition) makes things worse
Adult-imposed solutions can win the battle and lose the war — notice when enforcement is escalating rather than solving.
Why it works
Plan A — the adult imposes their will — works when the child has the skills to comply and simply needs a clear expectation. For a child with lagging flexibility or frustration tolerance, Plan A demands the very skills they lack, reliably triggering an explosion. The adult wins the power struggle but skips the skill-building that would prevent the next one. Recognizing the pattern makes it possible to shift strategies before the escalation cycle locks in.
How to do it
- After an explosion, ask: was this triggered by an adult-imposed demand the child lacked the skills to meet?
- Track which demands reliably produce explosions — these are unsolved problems, candidates for Plan B.
- Reserve Plan A for genuine safety issues where collaborative problem-solving isn’t feasible in the moment.
- For recurring Plan A failures, move the problem to proactive Plan B rather than increasing the consequence.
Evidence
Greene’s model is supported by research showing that punitive responses to skill-based deficits maintain or worsen behavior; consequence-based programs show limited durability for children with executive function deficits. A randomized control trial with oppositional youth found the collaborative alternative achieved outcomes comparable to established Parent Management Training, supporting a shift away from unilateral imposition. (clinical)
Direct comparative evidence for Plan A vs. Plan B in home settings is limited; the clinical principle is well established, the randomized evidence comes primarily from institutional contexts.
Sources
Common mistake
Doubling down on Plan A when it keeps failing, interpreting the explosion as the child “choosing” not to comply rather than as evidence that the skill isn’t there yet.
Practice this with IX Coach
More practices for Collaborative Problem Solving (Ross Greene)
- Identify the lagging skill behind the behavior
Name the cognitive skill the child is missing, not the behavior you want to stop.
- Use Plan B: the three-step collaborative conversation
Empathize with the child’s concern, share yours, and invite them to solve it together.
- Ross Greene’s Plan B, done proactively
Ross Greene’s Plan B works best proactively: hold the conversation in a calm window before the next explosion, not in the middle of one.
- Use empathy to de-escalate, not to capitulate
Name the child’s emotional state without agreeing with every demand — empathy and limits can coexist.
- Maintain an unsolved problems list
Write down recurring triggers so they become solvable problems rather than repeated emergencies.
- Evaluate solutions for durability: realistic, mutually satisfying, safe
A collaborative solution that fails one of three tests — realistic, mutually satisfying, safe — will not hold.