Classifying desires before pursuing them
Before pursuing a desire, classify it: is it natural and necessary, natural and unnecessary, or vain?
Why it works
Epicurus categorised desires into three types: natural and necessary (food, shelter, friendship, basic comfort — satisfiable and reliably pleasant); natural and unnecessary (luxurious food, physical beauty — satisfiable but with diminishing returns); and vain (fame, unlimited wealth, power — insatiable and anxiety-producing). Pursuing insatiable desires produces the anxiety they promised to relieve, not its resolution. The classification is a pre-commitment device that stops unsatisfying desire-chains before they start.
How to do it
- When a significant want arises, write it down and classify it honestly: does satisfying it reliably produce tranquility, or does it reliably escalate to wanting more?
- Ask: "Has getting more of this type of thing historically made me more or less anxious?"
- For vain desires, identify the natural and necessary desire they imperfectly proxy (e.g., status-seeking as a proxy for genuine belonging).
- Redirect energy toward the natural-and-necessary desire the vain one was attempting to satisfy.
Evidence
The distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (Ryan & Deci) maps closely onto the Epicurean taxonomy: intrinsic goals produce more sustained wellbeing than extrinsic ones; hedonic adaptation research shows that luxury goods satisfy less than their pursuit suggests. Kasser and Ryan found that centring financial success as a life aspiration — a paradigm vain desire — correlates with lower wellbeing and higher distress, directly supporting the claim that insatiable desires produce the anxiety they promise to relieve. (observational)
The Epicurean taxonomy is ancient practical philosophy, not an empirical construct; the mapping onto SDT and hedonic adaptation research is the author’s alignment, not a studied claim.
Sources
- Kasser & Ryan (1993), intrinsic vs extrinsic goals and wellbeing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 410-422.
- Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 280-287.
Common mistake
Classifying desires in a way that ratifies what you already want to pursue — using the taxonomy to confirm rather than examine. The classification should be uncomfortable at least occasionally.
Practice this with IX Coach
More practices for Epicurean Philosophy: Practical Happiness
- Practising ataraxia: removing sources of anxiety
Identify and address the sources of background anxiety rather than adding pleasures on top of them.
- Cultivating simple pleasures deliberately
Build a reliable repertoire of simple, accessible, non-escalating pleasures and protect time for them.
- Treating friendship as the most essential pleasure
Invest in the quality of a small number of close friendships as your primary wellbeing strategy.
- Examining the fear of death philosophically
Engage honestly with the Epicurean argument that death is not an evil — not to suppress fear but to examine its foundation.
- Creating a philosophical community of practice
Form or join a small group that meets regularly to examine how to live well — not just to succeed.
- Correcting hedonic forecasting errors
Before making a significant decision in pursuit of pleasure, check whether similar things have historically produced the wellbeing you predicted.