Pair the RACI with a decision log

Knowing who decides is only half the system — recording what was decided closes the accountability loop.

Why it works

RACI clarifies who has authority; a decision log records what that authority produced. Without a log, decisions made by the Accountable person can be revisited by other stakeholders who weren’t informed or who forgot. A shared, timestamped decision log makes decisions sticky — it’s hard to re-open a decision that is written down with its rationale and a named owner.

How to do it

  1. Create a simple shared document with columns: decision, date, Accountable person, options considered, rationale, and next review date if relevant.
  2. After each significant decision, have the A log it within 24 hours.
  3. Refer to the log explicitly in project updates: "as per the 5 June decision by [name], we are proceeding with..."

Evidence

Organizational memory research shows that undocumented decisions are frequently re-litigated, especially across personnel changes. A decision log provides the institutional memory that prevents recurring debates and accountability gaps. (mechanistic)

Decision-log effectiveness depends on discipline in maintaining it; a partially maintained log can be worse than none, implying the undocumented decisions were less important.

Common mistake

Relying on meeting minutes to serve as a decision log — minutes capture discussion, not the final decision and its owner, so they’re insufficient for accountability purposes.

Practice this with IX Coach

Start with IX Coach

More practices for The RACI Matrix, Made Practical

Related concepts