Decompose the unknown into knowable sub-problems

Break the question you cannot answer directly into smaller questions you can.

Why it works

Direct intuition about large, unfamiliar quantities is poorly calibrated — people cannot reliably estimate the number of gas stations in a country, but they can estimate the population, the number of cars per person, typical refueling frequency, and a station’s daily throughput. Decomposition replaces one impossible estimation task with several easier ones, each of which benefits from more available knowledge. Independent errors in sub-estimates also tend to cancel rather than compound.

How to do it

  1. Write the unknown quantity as a product or sum of sub-quantities.
  2. For each sub-quantity, ask: do I have any anchors for this from everyday knowledge?
  3. Estimate each sub-quantity independently, then combine.
  4. Do a sanity check: does the combined estimate feel plausible? If wildly implausible, re-examine the biggest input.

Evidence

Decomposition is a validated forecasting technique. Research in judgment and decision-making shows that decomposing estimation tasks into sub-problems reduces systematic bias in aggregate estimates, because errors in components are partially independent. MacGregor, Lichtenstein, and Slovic (1988) demonstrated experimentally that structuring an estimate as decomposed sub-judgments improved accuracy over holistic guessing, with the gain largest for quantities the estimator knew least about directly. (observational)

Decomposition helps when sub-estimates are genuinely independent; when errors are correlated (e.g., all influenced by the same wrong assumption), they do not cancel.

Sources

Common mistake

Decomposing into sub-problems that all depend on the same unknown variable, so errors correlate rather than cancel.

Practice this with IX Coach

Start with IX Coach

More practices for Fermi Estimation

Related concepts