IX Coach

Bad faith in existentialism: spot it in yourself

Bad faith (mauvaise foi) is Sartre’s name for denying your own freedom — treating yourself as fixed by role or circumstance when you are in fact choosing.

Why it works

Bad faith — mauvaise foi — is the concept Jean-Paul Sartre develops in Being and Nothingness (1943) for a particular self-deception: denying your own freedom by treating yourself as a fixed thing rather than a consciousness that chooses. His illustration is the café waiter whose movements are a shade too precise, playing at being a waiter as if the role were his nature rather than something he takes up each morning. It sits inside Sartre’s larger claim that existence precedes essence: because there is no given human nature to appeal to, refusing the choice is itself a choice. Bad faith disguises as necessity ("I have to", "there’s no alternative", "that’s just how I am") when the reality is a choice you are uncomfortable owning. Recognizing bad faith creates the discomfort of owning responsibility — which is exactly the point. It overlaps with the locus of control construct: internal locus (I choose) is associated with better outcomes than external locus (it happens to me).

How to do it

  1. When you find yourself saying "I have to" or "I have no choice", pause.
  2. Ask: is this actually true, or is it a choice whose costs I don’t want to own?
  3. Restate the sentence as a choice: "I am choosing to [X] because [real reason]."
  4. Notice the discomfort — that is the weight of ownership — and sit with it rather than retreating into necessity.

Evidence

Internal locus of control — believing your actions determine outcomes — is associated with better psychological and behavioral outcomes across multiple domains. Bad faith is the Sartrean name for the external-locus position when you are in fact free. A meta-analysis of locus of control at work (Ng, Sorensen, & Eby, 2006) confirms across many studies that an internal orientation predicts better well-being and performance, quantifying the pattern Sartre names. (observational)

The locus of control literature is real; the Sartrean framing goes further philosophically. Some situations genuinely constrain choice severely; "bad faith" must not become a guilt tool applied to people under real structural constraint.

Sources

Common mistake

Using bad faith as a self-punishment concept — "I’m in bad faith therefore I’m weak." Sartre’s point is that everyone is in bad faith regularly; the practice is recognition and reclamation, not shame.

Practice this with IX Coach

Start with IX Coach

More practices for Existentialism and Radical Choice

Related concepts

Frequently asked questions

Bad faith in existentialism: how do you spot it in yourself?

Bad faith — mauvaise foi — is the concept Jean-Paul Sartre develops in Being and Nothingness (1943) for a particular self-deception: denying your own freedom by treating yourself as a fixed thing rather than a consciousness that chooses. His illustration is the café waiter whose movements are a shade too precise, playing at being a waiter as if the role were his nature rather than something he takes up each morning. It sits inside Sartre’s larger claim that existence precedes essence: because there is no given human nature to appeal to, refusing the choice is itself a choice. Bad faith disguises as necessity ("I have to", "there’s no alternative", "that’s just how I am") when the reality is a choice you are uncomfortable owning. Recognizing bad faith creates the discomfort of owning responsibility — which is exactly the point. It overlaps with the locus of control construct: internal locus (I choose) is associated with better outcomes than external locus (it happens to me).

What is the most common mistake with bad faith in existentialism: spot it in yourself?

Using bad faith as a self-punishment concept — "I’m in bad faith therefore I’m weak." Sartre’s point is that everyone is in bad faith regularly; the practice is recognition and reclamation, not shame.