Uncover the real problem with "What’s the biggest challenge here?"
The stated position is rarely the real problem — ask for the challenge behind it.
Why it works
Positions ("I need X") are surface-level; interests and constraints are what actually drive behavior. Asking "What’s the biggest challenge you’re facing here?" shifts the frame from positional bargaining to problem-solving. The listener tends to answer honestly because the question is about their difficulty, not a demand for concession — and the answer almost always reveals more leverage and creative options than the original position did.
How to do it
- Instead of responding to a stated position, ask: "What’s the biggest challenge you’re facing with this?"
- When they answer, probe deeper: "What else is making this hard?"
- Resist the urge to immediately solve the problem they name — gather the full picture first.
- Use their answer to reframe your offer as a solution to their real constraint, not a response to their position.
Evidence
Interest-based versus position-based negotiation is one of the most durable findings in negotiation research: surfacing interests rather than trading positions consistently produces better outcomes for both parties. The calibrated question is one vehicle for doing that. Pinkley, Neale and Bennett show experimentally that the underlying alternatives and constraints a party carries — the stuff this question surfaces — do more to shape the settlement than the stated position ever does. (mechanistic)
Interest-based negotiation has substantial practitioner and research support; the specific question phrasing is Voss-style craft layered on top of that framework.
Sources
- Fisher, Ury & Patton (1981/2011), Getting to Yes — separating positions from interests
- Pinkley, R. L., Neale, M. A., & Bennett, R. J. (1994). The Impact of Alternatives to Settlement in Dyadic Negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(1), 97–116.
Common mistake
Jumping to solutions the moment the challenge is named, which signals you stopped listening — the question’s value is in what comes after it, not in the asking.
Practice this with IX Coach
More practices for Calibrated Questions, Made Practical
- Replace "why" with "how" or "what"
"Why" sounds accusatory; "how" and "what" invite problem-solving.
- Use "How am I supposed to do that?" to deflect impossible demands
Turning an unreasonable demand back into their problem collapses it without saying no.
- Make them solve the implementation for you
Ask "What does success look like?" and "How do we get there?" to make the other side do the planning.
- Ask what happens if there is no deal
Surface the other side’s BATNA by asking what they do if this does not work out.
- Use silence as the follow-up question
After a calibrated question, staying silent forces the other side to fill the space — usually with more than you asked for.
- Ask "What do we need to do to move forward?"
Forward-facing questions shift energy from arguing about the past to solving for the future.
Related concepts
- Never Split the Difference, In Practice
The FBI hostage-negotiation toolkit, with the mechanism behind each move
- Crucial Conversations, Made Practical
Safety, mutual purpose, STATE, and the stories that drive us
- Getting to Yes: Principled Negotiation
The Harvard method — negotiate on interests, not positions, and know your BATNA